The FQHC Operational AI Playbook

Start with your numbers, not our story.

A self-assessment pack for health center operations leaders: five numbers to pull from your own operation, six questions to answer before any vendor call, a vendor scorecard, a pilot charter, and a full nine-play case reference. Free, and usable whatever tools you choose.

Case reference: Aunt Martha's Health & Wellness. Production measures cover June 1 to July 28, 2026, with populations and denominators stated alongside the result.

Part one

Your five numbers

Measure your own operation before you talk to any vendor, including us. The case measures below show what a well-defined answer looks like. Every blank you cannot fill is a visibility gap, and that is a finding too.

Number 01

42.5%

Payer rows that needed no outreach

13,831 of 32,548 payer rows needed no outreach.

Denominator: all 32,548 payer rows in the measured file.

Number 02

72.8%

Patients contacted on two or more channels

A single-channel workflow would have missed the shape of the work.

Denominator: patients with recorded contact activity.

Number 03

85.1%

Referrals with first outreach within 24 hours

Median first outreach was 4.6 hours. For care gaps, 72.5% received first outreach within 24 hours, with a 9.5-hour median.

Populations: measured referral orders and care-gap items, reported separately.

Number 04

4,740

Staff actions across 2,749 referrals

Routine handling and staff judgement were measured separately.

Denominator: 2,749 referrals with recorded staff action.

Number 05

24.9%

Referrals escalated

80% of those escalations were due to internal routing or no available specialist.

Denominators: all measured referrals, then all escalated referrals.

Evidence window: June 1 to July 28, 2026. These are observed, case-specific measures, not projections. Use the same discipline on your own baseline: define the population, formula, date field, and exclusions before interpreting a result.

Part two

The six-question worksheet

If AI has a role, the harder part is operating it well. Work through these six questions on one of your own workflows before taking a vendor call.

  1. Name the outcome you want for patients and staff

  2. Confirm no staff replacement, no system switch

  3. Define what success looks like on day one

  4. Give every metric one definition and one denominator

  5. Instrument before you scale

  6. Plan the change curve and the hypercare

Part three

The vendor scorecard

Make any vendor, including us, show you these six things before you trust their numbers.

A living metric dictionary

One definition per metric: population, formula, date field, and exclusions. When two views disagree, the dictionary decides.

Denominator rules

Every percentage travels with its base and population. Two percentages can both be true while describing different groups.

A zero must mean zero

Separate zero from not tracked, not wired, and field empty. Ambiguous zeros cannot support decisions.

Complete audit trails

Give every action an actor and a timestamp. Complete attribution changed one coordinator’s recorded resolutions from 22 to 61.

Screen equals export

What leadership sees on screen must match what finance downloads. Require parity checks.

Label grain and time basis

State whether a measure is per patient or per record, and whether it uses order date or action date.

Part four

The phase-gated pilot charter

Start narrow and earn the next step. The scope will be yours; the gate discipline is the part to keep.

Pilot

Prove one bounded workflow

  • Referrals and care gaps
  • One payer
  • Eleven named metrics
  • Definitions and denominators set before measurement

Gate

Verify before expansion

  • Closure definition agreed
  • Screen and export reconciled
  • Staff time baselined
  • Adoption and workflow risks named

Phase I

Expand with evidence

  • Seventeen named metrics
  • All five MCOs
  • All specialty referrals
  • Continued hypercare and adoption review

The expansion rule

Move to the next phase only when the measurement, workflow, and people-change gates are all met.

Part five

The full case playbook, as reference

How Aunt Martha's approached the work: nine operating plays in sequence, followed by the four lessons we would carry into the next implementation.

  1. Name the work honestly

    Closing care gaps and coordinating referrals was a capacity gap, not a technology gap. The backlog identified work that volume had pushed beyond the team’s available time.

    Start with the work that never gets done consistently. The backlog is the brief.

  2. Set guardrails before tools

    Extend capacity, keep the people, and keep athenahealth. Protect the patient experience with approved scripts, operator-set outreach windows, and an opt-out model reviewed by legal.

    Automate routine work. Keep judgement and relationships with the team.

  3. Close the loop, don’t add a tool

    Design the operating model end to end, from the first input to the final write-back.

    Inputs

    Care-gap files, referral orders, measure rules, patient context

    Engine

    Validate, prioritize, reach, book. SMS, email, and voice AI in English and Spanish.

    Outputs

    Appointments booked, documented closure, staff action when judgement is needed

    Write-back

    Status, outcome, and next action returned to the system of record

    The measured sequence planned nine touchpoints over 14 days.

  4. Measure so good work gets seen

    Measurement protects the patient and makes previously invisible work visible. It creates accountability without turning the dashboard into surveillance.

    With complete attribution, one coordinator’s recorded resolutions moved from 22 to 61.

  5. Lead the change curve on purpose

    Plan for go-live optimism, the visibility dip, the turn, and team ownership. Name the discomfort, set fair targets, stay visible, and celebrate improvement.

    The team should run the dashboard, not the other way around.

  6. Hypercare after go-live

    Use daily drop-in help, a shared weekly tracker, explicit escalation paths, item-by-item verification, rapid iteration, training, and staff communication.

    In one hypercare review, 19 of 25 delivered items were confirmed after item-by-item verification.

  7. Earn trust in the numbers

    Apply the six scorecard rules to every operating report. Trust is earned when the metric dictionary, denominator, audit trail, screen, and export agree.

    A useful automation knows its limits and makes those limits visible.

  8. Instrument before you scale

    Track the referral ladder from order ingested to loop closed: validated, specialist matched, packet faxed, patient reached, scheduled, seen, consult note returned, and closed.

    The case used nine referral stages and ten operational reports.

  9. Phase-gate the expansion

    Move from a bounded pilot to broader operations only after the agreed measurement, workflow, and adoption gates are met.

    Pilot: 11 metrics and one payer. Phase I: 17 metrics, five MCOs, and all specialty referrals.

What we learned

What we’d tell the next operator

Define closed on day one

Two reasonable definitions of the same result produce two different numbers. Pick one before you measure.

State the denominator

A percentage without its base invites the wrong conclusion. Put both on the same slide.

Measure staff time from the start

Baseline it before go-live so you can show the gain with confidence afterwards.

Lead the people change yourself

A memo is not change management. Set the expectation, stay visible through the first weeks, and make it safe for the team to rely on the new way of working.

Three lines to carry forward

The operating principles

  1. Buy back capacity. Keep your people.

  2. What gets measured finally gets done.

  3. Go-live is halftime. Adoption is the win.

Keep going

Put the playbook to work

Continue with practical worksheets, buyer guidance, operating guides, and the complete case study.